If you’ve logged in to Twitter recently, you may have seen that a trending keyword is “forfeiture”. In the same way that a housefly is drawn to dirt, allegations of wrongdoing are never too far away from the BAT. The latest is based on the release of court-certified documents investigating his alleged involvement in narcotics and money laundering 30 years ago.
To be fair, this isn’t really news because the allegations have been there for some time. However, the timing and availability of actual documents have done more public image damage to his campaign.
His campaign spokesman, Festus Keyamo, was on TV recently and described the controversy as a “storm in a teacup.” He claimed that of the 10 accounts linked to the BAT, the $460,000 deducted from one of his accounts was simply tax on investments domiciled in US banks.
The key piece of contention came from a term in the document, titled as a “verified complaint of forfeiture.” The TV host noted that the dictionary definition of forfeiture is the giving up of something as the penalty for wrongdoing, to which Keyamo responded in a charged manner and accused the host of “imposing his opinion”, while adding that the dictionary definition of the term is different from the legal definition.
So, I decided to check out what forfeiture really means, according to Illinois laws, where the forfeiture took place.
Here’s what I found: “Asset forfeiture is the permanent confiscation of private property by law enforcement agencies at the local, state and federal levels. Illinois and federal law both permit law enforcement agencies to take cash, land, vehicles and other property they suspect is involved in or derived from illegal activity.”
|